A motor insurance policyholder has won a significant dispute over fraud allegations, with the industry ombudsman ruling in favour of a payout following a controversial car accident claim.
The case revolved around an incident where the claimant's wife crashed at an intersection one evening, reportedly failing to yield.
The lack of photographic evidence due to shock and subsequent involvement of towing services complicated matters.
Suncorp, the insurer, challenged the legitimacy of the claim, citing inconsistencies in the timeline regarding the husband’s arrival at the crash scene. Additionally, the absence of a police report, unreachable towing service contacts, and testimony from local residents indicating no observed accident raised suspicion. Suncorp’s investigator even found no crash evidence at the claimed location, while a forensic expert suggested the vehicle might have been stationary when hit and noted the absence of seat belt use.
The policyholder's attempts to alter the car's insurance value compounded the insurer's doubts, particularly following a failed attempt to substantially increase its sum insured. Despite these allegations, the vehicle was insured for $52,000, down from the attempted $75,000 adjustment.
However, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) countered with indications that the couple had few financial motives, presenting modest savings and no debts. AFCA accepted that crash site cleanup in residential areas is understandable and argued Suncorp misapplied its forensic interpretations. Though recognising inconsistencies in the couple’s story, AFCA concluded they weren't significant enough to warrant rejecting the insurance claim.
AFCA underscores the importance of fair consideration in insurance claims and stresses that discrepancies in personal testimonies during traumatic events should be weighed with care.
Moving forward, this ruling might prompt insurance companies to reassess their investigative approaches and criteria for claim rejection based on circumstantial evidence. Such cases highlight the delicate balance insurers must maintain between vigilance against fraud and the fair treatment of policyholders.
A motor insurance policyholder has won a significant dispute over fraud allegations, with the industry ombudsman ruling in favour of a payout following a controversial car accident claim. The case revolved around an incident where the claimant's wife crashed at an intersection one evening, reportedly failing to yield. The lack of photographic evidence due to shock and subsequent involvement of towing services complicated matters. - read more
In a strategic move set to bolster its market position, NM Insurance has announced a five-year agreement with capacity provider Zurich, positioning itself for further growth and increased broker confidence in its success. Since its establishment two decades ago as Nautilus Marine Insurance Agency, NM Insurance has expanded its focus beyond the recreational boat market in Australia, branching into New Zealand and diversifying into the commercial marine, caravan, and motorcycle sectors. - read more
In an era where cyber threats are increasingly sophisticated, CFC Underwriting Limited has unveiled a unique opportunity for brokers to fortify their expertise through its newly launched Cyber Masterclass. This initiative offers a flexible, on-demand video learning series designed to advance brokers into proficient cyber insurance specialists at their convenience. - read more
New South Wales (NSW) is undertaking a detailed review of its Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance scheme as well as its lifetime care and support system. The Standing Committee on Law and Justice of the state's upper house has initiated this examination as part of their routine practice conducted every parliamentary term. The last thorough assessment took place in 2022. - read more
A recent decision by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled against a homeowner seeking an $18,000 refund from Allianz. The homeowner claimed that the insurer failed to adequately inform her about substantial increases in her optional flood cover premiums. Initially, her monthly payments surged from $369 to $1277 in August 2022, a change she only noticed in March of the following year through her bank statements. - read more
As a real estate professional, safeguarding your business through adequate insurance is crucial. The real estate industry is fraught with risks, from property damage to client disputes, and insurance serves as a safety net, ensuring that you're protected against unforeseen circumstances. - read more
In the ever-changing world of real estate, understanding and managing risks are crucial tasks for any real estate agent. From fluctuating market conditions to regulatory shifts, several elements can affect the value and profitability of property investments. Effective risk management practices are essential for protecting assets and ensuring long-term success in this dynamic industry. - read more
In the vibrant world of real estate, understanding and managing risks is crucial for success. Real estate agents face a variety of risks that can impact their reputation, financial stability, and client relationships. Navigating these risks effectively is essential for maintaining a thriving business and ensuring client satisfaction. - read more
Income protection insurance is designed to provide financial support if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures a portion of your income continues to be paid during times when you cannot earn. This type of insurance acts as a safety net, offering peace of mind by securing your financial stability during challenging times. - read more
In the dynamic world of real estate, managing risks is as crucial as closing a sale. Real estate agents in Australia constantly navigate a landscape full of potential pitfalls, from market fluctuations to client disputes. Understanding these risks and having strategies to manage them is essential for a successful career. - read more
Knowledgebase
Insurance Deductible: the amount that an insured is required to contribute toward an insurance claim as stipulated in an insurance policy. Otherwise known as the "policy excess".